Right menu

Cartoon


Welcome > Themes > Alternative Fuels > News > IMF economist criticises biofuels strategies

IMF economist criticises biofuels strategies

The chief economist at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has criticised the United States and Europe over their biofuels strategies.

Food prices are just crazy these days and IMF blames biodiesel.

Simon Johnson, IMF’s chief economist, says that Europe’s and the United States’ approaches to biofuels production inevitably have a negative influence on food prices.

Speaking on the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 in the UK, Johnson estimated that around twenty to thirty per cent of the increase in food prices over the last few years could be laid at the door of biofuels.

Everybody’s in
“It’s true for corn based ethanol in the United States, and that spills over to wheat and we know that’s knocked onto other crops in various ways. But biodiesel is a similar kind of issue in Europe, so I’m afraid everybody’s in this,” he said.

Better ways
When asked specifically about the US, Johnson said that, “our position has been that the subsidy structure and particularly the tariffs that are used in the United States, for example, are not a good idea and these should be dismantled as soon as possible. If you want to provide for support agriculture, there’s better ways to do that. If you want to support technology and development, there’s better ways to do that. If you want to address issues of food supply or food availability, there’s better ways to do that. So unfortunately, we’ve got a combination of policies that doesn’t make a lot of sense.”

Comments

But there IS promising policy

Sustainability criteria for biofuels: however, i fear (but i hope not) it may be too little too late to prevent "good" biofuels' images from being damaged as well. It will take ages before we will see an EU common policy that's not rendered dead it the water because each and every country will have its say and then there's the WTO that may spoil the party anyhow. Even 2nd gen biofuels may suffer as research investments may be shifted to other alternative energy sources.